MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6998379951

Energy

2003· article· en· W6998379951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy securityGeopoliticsFossil fuelGovernment (linguistics)Energy supplyEnergy policyProduction (economics)Energy sourceEnvironmental impact of the energy industry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy is critical to the vitality and endurance of a nation's economy, fueling all industries and supporting military, diplomatic, informational and economic instruments of power. Energy is the only industry sector addressed in the U.S. National Security Strategy. Ensuring the security of America's energy resources is challenging due to our dependency on foreign fuel sources, especially oil and gas. This dependency is caused by a predominate use of fossil fuels, the large reserves of fossil fuels located outside the United States, a lack of adequate infrastructure to move natural gas and oil from pump to consumer, environmental and political restrictions within the United States, and a relatively minor U.S. surge capability to counteract geopolitical realities. As our domestic supply production decreases, projected increases in economic growth will drive increases in demand, which must be increasingly met through imported sources. This reality makes policies that promote international trade and diversity in fuel types and sources the cornerstone for energy security. Our study incorporates issues and findings from the countries we visited: Canada, Britain, and Spain. We found that the energy industry is not in crisis; however, U.S. government policies, laws, dollars, and even public awareness campaigns must be used to increase energy security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2840.153

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Same topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207