Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueRepository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · 2019
Typebook
Languagehu
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Regional Development FundUniversität InnsbruckLomonosov Moscow State UniversityTempus KözalapítványMinistry of Science Research and TechnologyUniverzita Komenského v BratislaveNatural Resources CanadaEmberi Eroforrások MinisztériumaMacquarie UniversityMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaSiberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaUniversidad Complutense de MadridNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós AlapAustrian Science FundDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemEuropean CommissionRussian Academy of SciencesRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Current (fluid)Calculus (dental)Inclusion (mineral)
DOInot available
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexXXV European Current Research on Fluid inclusion (2019) absztrakt kötete, Vendégszerkesztő: Márta Berkesi, Guzmics Tibor, B. Kis Gabriella., Cseresznyés Dóra
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
