MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6998511790

ANÁLISE PROTEÔMICA DO FUNGO CRYPTOCOCCUS GATTII EM DIFERENTES TEMPERATURAS

2010· other· pt· W6998511790 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLume (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) · 2010
Typeother
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRural Development Administration
KeywordsCryptococcus gattiiCryptococcosisCryptococcusPathogenicity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptococcus gattii é uma levedura basidiomicética, considerada um patógeno primário e um dos agentes etiológicos da criptococose e foi responsável, recentemente, por uma epidemia de criptococose nas Ilhas Vancouver, Canadá. Dentre os principais fatores relacionados à patogenicidade desse microrganismo estão a cápsula polissacarídica, a produção do pigmento melanina e a capacidade de multiplicação a 37°C, que o torna capaz de estabelecer infecção no hospedeiro. A identificação de proteínas envolvidas na interação patógeno-hospedeiro é de suma importância, possibilitando a compreensão dos mecanismos utilizados pelo patógeno para a infecção. Atualmente poucos trabalhos envolvendo Cryptococcus spp. e análises proteômicas são reportados. Neste estudo a linhagem hipervirulenta R265 de C. gattii foi analisada com o objetivo de evidenciar proteínas diferencialmente expressas no desenvolvimento da levedura a 25°C e 37°C. A análise proteômica comparativa por eletroforese bidimensional possibilitou evidenciar quinze proteínas com expressão aumentada a 25°C e vinte e nove proteínas com expressão aumentada a 37°C. A identificação das proteínas diferencialmente expressas verificadas neste estudo, além de contribuir para um melhor entendimento dos mecanismos utilizados por C. gattii para colonizar o hospedeiro, garantindo seu desenvolvimento na temperatura de infecção, também são potenciais alvos para estudos de desenvolvimento de novas terapias para o tratamento da criptococose ocasionada por este patógeno.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLume (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)Same topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207