Ampliación del Alcantarillado Combinado del Barrio Miranda Alto, Parroquia de Amaguaña - Cantón Quito
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the population growth in the city of Quito, the surrounding suburban parishes have experienced during the last decades, a considerable population increase, coming from the city and provinces. \nThus the Miranda Alto neighborhood, started more than 20 years ago, as a housing cooperative, divided by sectors Miranda Alto and the Miranda Grande Commune, these originate in the delivery of lots to the villagers of the Hacienda Miranda in the process of Agrarian Reform more than 30 years ago. In turn, these lots are subdivided, and transferring in inheritance, which with the construction of houses are increasing the population of the sector. \nFor the South-Eastern parishes of Conocoto and Amaguaña, Empresa Pública Metropolitana de Agua Potable y Saneamiento (EPMAPS) was executed in previous years project called Tesalia; therefore consideration is being given to the planning of sewage works to guarantee an environmentally sustainable service, contributing to the improvement of living conditions and health of the inhabitants of Miranda Alto neighborhood. \nIn the study phase, a sewer with an independent system and a sewage system with a combined system were used as alternatives, with which its pre-feasibility and feasibility were analyzed, based on technical and economic aspects. So it was concluded that the second alternative is the most suitable for the neighborhood. \nBased on the topography of the sector, this system has two discharges to the existing network in Rio Napo Street, which is the main access to the Miranda Alto neighborhood. \nThe project investment is US $ 881,606.01 which represents a favorable economic balance and the construction is technically executable. \nFinally, the sheet corresponding to the environmental management plan is made, according to the current laws and based on the analysis of environmental impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".