MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6998601137

AN ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL WETLAND VEGETATION MAP COVERAGES. PRODUCED BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND SATELLITE IMAGERY NETLEY-LIBAU MARSH, 2001

2014· report· en· W6998601137 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2014
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerial photographyWetlandVegetation (pathology)MarshSatellite imageryMultispectral imageVegetation classificationAerial surveySatellite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Netley-Libau Marsh, the largest coastal wetland adjoining Lake Winnipeg, has been mapped by aerial photography in the past (Grosshans et al 2004; Verbiwski 1986), indicating a trend of vegetation loss, but a lack of historic aerial photography has limited mapping efforts to sporadic intervals. Landsat imagery, though of a coarser spatial resolution, has the advantage of high temporal and spectral resolution. In this study, a classified digital vegetation map was created for Netley-Libau Marsh in 2001 using GIS software, Landsat 7 imagery, and a visual classification methodology, for the purposes of comparison with an existing digital vegetation map produced by Grosshans et al (2004) from aerial photography obtained during the same year. Visual delineation and classification of Landsat multispectral imagery was a method suitable for producing wetland maps which distinguish vegetated from non-vegetated areas with a high degree of accuracy, as compared to the truthed Grosshans et al map. Whereas that photography-based mapping exercise distinguished 23 vegetation classes grouped under six marsh zones; this study was able to successfully distinguish five marsh zones – water, not vegetated, emergent wetland vegetation, wet meadow, and upland. Further distinction and categorization of three marsh zones into seven vegetation classes was also possible, but with a lower degree of accuracy. This report describes the methods used to evaluate differences in surface area of equivalent classes between the two mapping exercises. It also provides recommendation for the future analysis of Landsat images to produce a time series of classified digital vegetation maps that may be used to explore relationships between lake and river hydrology and wetland plant cover. This knowledge will be fundamental to guide management and remediation efforts for the benefit of Netley-Libau Marsh and Lake Winnipeg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)French-language works237,207