MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6998607409

Anàlisi de l’eficiència del servei de taxi a Barcelona. Propostes de millora

2010· dissertation· ca· W6998607409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageca
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismQuarter (Canadian coin)Electrocution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'objectiu que s'aborda en aquesta Tesina és analitzar la situació del taxi a l'AMB i\nproposar mesures encaminades a millorar-ne l'eficiència. Aquesta optimització del\nservei del taxi ha donat peu a nombrosos estudis arreu del món en què es proposaven\ndiferents models de predicció de la demanda en funció de la tarifa imposada i de la\nmida de la flota, entre d‟altres paràmetres. El document presentat, però, difereix\nd'aquesta tendència de la teoria clàssica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)Same topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207