The applications of stable isotope research in Canada's archaeological past: reconstruction of ancient diets in the northwest Pacific coast, the Canadian Prairies and southern Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stable isotopic research has provided archaeologists with a unique window to\nthe past. Using stable isotopes, archaeologists are able to determine various\nsocial, economic, and political aspects of a past population. Furthermore, with\nisotopic research one is also able to reconstruct the environmental and\necological context in which a past society lived. The focus of this article will be\nupon the recent isotopic research undertaken to better understand dietary\ntrends among various groups in Canada's prehistory. Specifically, this article will\nfocus upon understanding the importance of marine resources among the\ngroups living along the Northwest coast of British Columbia, as well as\nunderstanding the spread and consumption of maize among groups in the\nCanadian Prairies and southern Ontario. This paper, then, will largely be a\nsummation of past archeological research to highlight the progress that has\nbeen made in the last few decades in understanding Canada's rich and\ncolourful past.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".