MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6998639579

Analisis Nyanyian Maneak Mes Biinmafo dalam Seni Bonet pada Sanggar Paisanaunu di Desa T'eba Kecamatan Biboki Tanpah Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara

2024· other· en· W6998639579 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira (Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Theme (computing)Meaning (existential)SingingDanceEvent (particle physics)MusicalPresentation (obstetrics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bonet is one of the oldest dances on the island of Timor. Bonet is an art which in its presentation involves several artistic elements, namely dance, literary art and musical art (singing). There is a lot of singing in the Bonet dance. The theme of the song depends on the context of the event taking place. One of the songs in the Bonet dance is the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song. This song was performed by the Paisanaunu studio at the Bonet competition on the occasion of the anniversary of the city of Kefa. Even though the Bonet dance is often performed in the community, some people do not have a good understanding of the Bonet dance. The main problems in this research are (1) What is the process of presenting the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song? (2) What is the meaning of the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song? This research aims to (1) describe the process of presenting the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song: (2) identify the meaning of the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song. This research was conducted using a qualitative approach and the method used was ethnography. Data collection techniques use interviews, observation and documentation. Research data was analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research show that (1) the process of presenting the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song is that the male and female dancers form a semicircle. This song is presented in succession, starting with an initial call by the male singer and repeated by the female singer. After that, the male singer sings the first verse, then the female singer repeats the same verse in different notation. This process is repeated until the last verse; (2) The meaning contained in the song Maneak Mes Biinmafo is an emotive meaning related to feelings and reactions found in the first and second verses. The connotative meaning related to the association of feelings spoken or heard is found in the third, fourth and fifth poems, while the cognitive meaning related to the word or object referred to based on component analysis is found in all the poems in the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira (Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala)French-language works237,207