Analisis Nyanyian Maneak Mes Biinmafo dalam Seni Bonet pada Sanggar Paisanaunu di Desa T'eba Kecamatan Biboki Tanpah Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bonet is one of the oldest dances on the island of Timor. Bonet is an art which in its presentation involves several artistic elements, namely dance, literary art and musical art (singing). There is a lot of singing in the Bonet dance. The theme of the song depends on the context of the event taking place. One of the songs in the Bonet dance is the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song. This song was performed by the Paisanaunu studio at the Bonet competition on the occasion of the anniversary of the city of Kefa. Even though the Bonet dance is often performed in the community, some people do not have a good understanding of the Bonet dance. The main problems in this research are (1) What is the process of presenting the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song? (2) What is the meaning of the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song? This research aims to (1) describe the process of presenting the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song: (2) identify the meaning of the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song. This research was conducted using a qualitative approach and the method used was ethnography. Data collection techniques use interviews, observation and documentation. Research data was analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research show that (1) the process of presenting the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song is that the male and female dancers form a semicircle. This song is presented in succession, starting with an initial call by the male singer and repeated by the female singer. After that, the male singer sings the first verse, then the female singer repeats the same verse in different notation. This process is repeated until the last verse; (2) The meaning contained in the song Maneak Mes Biinmafo is an emotive meaning related to feelings and reactions found in the first and second verses. The connotative meaning related to the association of feelings spoken or heard is found in the third, fourth and fifth poems, while the cognitive meaning related to the word or object referred to based on component analysis is found in all the poems in the Maneak Mes Biinmafo song.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".