Annotated catalogue and bibliography of marine and estuarine shrimps, lobsters, crabs and their allies (Crustacea: Decapoda) of Argentina and Uruguay (Southwestern Atlantic Ocean)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twenty seven years ago, the ComisiónTécnica Mixta del Frente Marítimo publisheda catalogue of marine decapod andstomatopod crustaceans registered in coasts,continental shelf and slope, and deep waters ofArgentina (Boschi et al., 1992), that included 93species of decapods. Later, a list of decapods ofUruguay appeared with 107 marine and estuarinespecies (Zolessi and Philippi, 1995). Sincethen, the acknowledgement of the importanceof biodiversity for the human kind and the manyprocesses affecting it, such as the growing ratesof biological invasions and global climate change,make necessary to review previous knowledgeon local biodiversity. Moreover, the incresinguse of molecular techniques in taxonomic revisionshave unveiled the existence of misidentifications,cryptic species and species complexin numbers that significantly alter our previousconsiderations on species richness at the localand regional scales. The present catalogue includesthe addition and removal of species andan actualization of the published bibliographyrelated with them. The study area comprises estuariesand marine waters of the SouthwesternAtlantic Ocean in front of Uruguay and Argentina(33-60ºS), including the coasts, continentalshelf and slope, the contiguous abysal plains,the Malvinas, Georgias del Sur and Sandwich delSur Islands and the Scotia Sea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.025 | 0.026 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".