Atlantic Flyway Review--region Ii
Bibliographic record
Abstract
17 8.89 Once again the period was generally hot and dry with no significant westerlies, cold fronts, or rainy spells.Fog was nearly constant through mid-August.A good warbler movement was noted between the hours of 1030 and 1300 on 2 September when wind gusted to 20 mph out of the west.Forty-five birds were netted on this date (representing almost 27 percent of the season total), making it the seasoffs biggest day.Spring 1984 is said to have been the wettest since recordkeeping began.By mid-August wild food crops, with the exception of spruce cones, were fair at best, as continued fog and lack of sunshine appeared to retard both flowering and subsequent ripening.Elsewhere in Maine wild food crops were described as phenomenal, and some observers felt that this largess may have caused some migrants to take a more inland route.After only 5 years, with so small sample, it is difficult to draw any conclusions at all.Only two species, Black-andwhite Warbler and Bay-breasted Warbler, have been among the top 10 species banded in each of the 5 years of operation.Nineteen species have figured in the totals for all 5 years.Four of these appear to have declined over the period, as does a fifth, Blackpoll Warbler, which was encountered in the first four years but not in the fifth.One other species, Black-capped Chickadee, may be experiencing a decline, as later field observations suggest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".