"The analysis on the issue of marital rape" / Hana Sakina Abdullah Sani...[et al.]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The issue of Marital Rape has been debated throughout the world among the feminist organizations. Since its recognition in some countries such as United States of America, Canada and Korea, Malaysia has also been exposed to the issue on Marital Rape. However, due to some circumstances, the law on Marital Rape faces some difficulties in terms implementation of the said law in Malaysia. The purpose of conducting this research is to analyze issue of marital rape throughout the world. In addition, whether the law of marital rape can be introduce in our country. Although there is no specific law in Malaysia on this issue, we cannot disregard the severity of this matter. This is due to the fact that around the world more and more countries have recognized marital rape as law. In order to produce this research, various sources will be referred to. These sources include legal materials such as statutes, case law and articles. Interviews have also been conducted with the legal academician of UiTM. It is hope that this research will give some wider perspective on the issue of marital rape in Malaysia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".