Arthur Shilling: Anishinaabemowin-Mazinibiiʼigewinini
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arthur Shilling, Anishinaabe artist from Mnjikaning First Nation in southern Ontario, was one of the first generation, contemporary Native painters who emerged in the early years in the formation of a "Canadian Native" art. Born in 1941, Shilling was, first, an artist who wrestled with the creation of a dignified expression of a people struggling to place themselves within the general population, and second, a man whose principles demanded the preservation of cultural and personal integrity. Shilling's "people-portraits" transcended the narrow definitions of "Native" or "Indian" art, with his artistry too close to Western styles to be comfortably catalogued as "Indian art." He was among the first Aboriginal artists to take control of his own representation, and his uncompromising conviction in the integrity and power of the "Indian" impelled such a distinction of style that, even today, his work blurs the boundaries between "Native" and Western or mainstream art. When Shilling began painting in the late 1950s, Canada's First Nations were just emerging from the political and social custody of the reservation era. Changes to the Indian Act removed the worst restrictions, however many of the colonial mechanisms still remained. National and local identities for both the Aboriginal community and the larger Canadian society were undergoing pronounced changes, creating a tension in the cultural, political and social environments. It was in this context that Shilling was painting. However, his lifelong pursuit was more for the spiritual content within himself than for the "Indian" within the Canadian establishment. He did not tum to others for his identity; rather, he turned inwards, increasingly dependent on the unresolved passions within himself. In doing so, Shilling produced a remarkable body of work that articulated his community in a manner rarely seen, and with an insight that expressed the experience and spirit of the First Nations person intimately. Along with an examination of Shilling's work, the context, and the influences which impressed his canvasses, a discussion of the formation of Canadian "Native" art and the attitudes that simultaneously defined and excluded innumerable artists is presented in this thesis. Arthur Shilling died in 1986.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".