MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6998779424

Audiovisual multisensory integration in young adults with and without a diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

2019· dissertation· en· W6998779424 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMultisensory perception and integration
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyYoung adultNeurophysiologySensory systemMultisensory integrationAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderBrain activity and meditationSensory processing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with behavioural and neurophysiological characteristics. Several cortical structures that are altered in ADHD are involved in the process of multisensory integration (MSI). MSI is a fundamental form of sensory processing involved in many everyday tasks. Therefore, it is important to know whether those with ADHD experience altered MSI. Two different paradigms were used to assess MSI in adults with a diagnosis of ADHD. First, a simple response time (RT) task was completed. Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis revealed that those with ADHD had MSI occur, while there were significant differences in brain activity between groups. Study two employed a two-alternative forced-choice discrimination task. Those with ADHD responded faster than controls. EEG analysis revealed that those with ADHD have enhanced MSI. Activity differences were found in brain regions that are structurally altered in those with ADHD, indicating that structural alterations in ADHD may promote sensory processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)Same topicMultisensory perception and integrationFrench-language works237,207