MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6998846455

Bone mineral density of young, healthy Canadian women

2010· dissertation· en· W6998846455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone mineralOsteoporosisBone healthAffect (linguistics)Bone densityLinear regressionYoung adultPhysical activityLumbar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Bone mineral density (BMD) of healthy young women is not commonly measured. Descriptive research on factors that influence BMD could be useful in osteoporosis prevention, and could lead to the development of Canadian BMD reference standards. Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of 52 undergraduate students. BMD was measured at three clinically relevant sites using a Discovery Wi (Hologic Inc.) dual energy X-ray absorptiometer. Participants also completed a demographic questionnaire. Results: Mean BMDs measured at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and whole body were, (respectively), 0.863±0.11; 1.019±0.09 and 1.085±0.07 g/cm2. Television watching, lactose intolerance, alcoholic drinks per week, and age were used in a linear regression model to predict whole body BMD ('r'2=0.727, p<0.001). Conclusions: Based on criteria established by the World Health Organization, young women in this group present with lower than expected BMD. Factors which influence bone health in older women also affect BMD in young women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicBone health and osteoporosis research→French-language works237,207→