MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6998930797

Cálculo de parámetros hidrogeológicos por influencia de la marea a diferentes profundidades en la zona de descarga del acuífero costero Motril-Salobreña (Granada)

2013· article· es· W6998930797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoastal zoneTelmatologyNova scotia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La influencia de la oscilación de mareas en las medidas de nivel piezométrico \nse detectó de forma clara en puntos profundos de la zona de descarga \ndel acuífero costero Motril-Salobreña, obteniendo diferentes valores de \ndifusividad (T/S) en función de la profundidad, de la distancia del punto de \nmedida al borde costero y del método de cálculo utilizado. Se ha registrado \nel nivel piezométrico en diferentes puntos someros y profundos del borde \ncostero con el fin de comparar los resultados con los obtenidos previamente \na mayor profundidad, concluyendo que los valores de difusividad aumentan \na mayores profundidades. No obstante, considerando un medio homogéneo, \nlos valores de transmisividad se presentan diferentes en un sector tan reducido \ndel acuífero cuando deberían ser similares. Se deduce de ello que el \nfactor variable debe ser el coeficiente de almacenamiento, en función de si \nse produce o no saturación-desaturación (variaciones de nivel cerca de la \nsuperficie)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva)Same topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207