MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999025053

CANINE PROGRAM AS A COMPONENT OF THE US BORDER PATROL AGENTS’ TRAINING

2017· article· ru· W6999025053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovative Solutions in Modern Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPatrollingBorder SecurityLaw enforcementTerrorismAgency (philosophy)Foreign nationalEnforcementVocational educationDrug trafficking
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article under consideration deals with the issue of the US border patrol vocational training, and canine training as its componential part.The object of the article is the US border patrol canine program; the subject of the article is the structure of the canine program.The aim of the article is to identify main directions and trends of the canine training program; detect its structure and main peculiarities.Received results would play an important role in further research of the US border patrol agents vocational training and serve a good model for other countries in the world in protection their borders.Key words: border patrol agents, canine program, detection dogs, canine centers, component of training.Introduction.Today, when world terrorism is constantly developing, people all over the world are looking for new ways and methods of its prevention.The USA as a county that fights against the terrorism can serve a good example of innovative methods against terrorism implementation.The United Stated Border Patrol is an American federal law enforcement agency.The mission of this agency is to detect and prevent undocumented immigrants, terrorists and terrorist weapons from entering the territory of this country.The U.S. Border Patrol is a federal law enforcement agent patrolling the U.S. border to prevent persons from entering or leaving the United States without government permission.Agents detect and prevent the smuggling and unlawful entry of aliens into the United States, along with apprehending those people found to be in violation of immigration laws.Agents work to lower crimes and improve the quality of life in border communities.In some areas, Agents are deputized or have peace-officer status and use it to enforce local and state/territory laws.More than 20,000 Border Patrol Agents safeguard nearly 6,000 miles of land border the United States shares with Canada and Mexico, and more than 2,000 miles of coastal waters [1].Apart from patrolling and watching, the US Border Patrol has also a special canine program.With the help of special dogs patrolling becomes easier and more efficient.In the aftermath of the terrorist acts of September 11, 2001, the realignment of federal agencies and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) thrust the Border Patrol Canine Program into uncharted territory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.461
GPT teacher head0.563
Teacher spread0.102 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it