MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999088070

Book Review: Schopenhauer's Philosophy of Religion: The Death of God and the Oriental Renaissance: RyanChristopher Schopenhauer's Philosophy of Religion: The Death of God and the Oriental Renaissance. (Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters, 2010). Pp. xi+249. â¬42.00 (Pbk). ISBN 978 90 429 2215 0

2017· other· en· W6999088070 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuereroDoc Digital Library · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of FrederictonUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoralityReading (process)Argument (complex analysis)Moral philosophyNatural (archaeology)Value (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whether or not one embraces the claim that Hume should be read as consciously advocating strong moral atheism, Holden provides a detailed argument that Hume's account of morality is inconsistent with any view of God as possessing moral attributes.In seeking to integrate Hume's theories concerning moral psychology with his well-known critiques of natural theology, this monograph provides an important exercise in reading Hume holistically.One need not think that Hume is invariably consistent in his views, or even to agree with the central tenets of Hume's philosophy, to see the value in this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.013
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuereroDoc Digital LibraryFrench-language works237,207