Child-to-parental violence and empathy in Peruvian adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the concomitance of child-parent violence and adolescent empathy in the district of Imperial in the Province of Cañete, Lima, 2018. This was an investigation carried out under a basic quantitative method of descriptive comparative type with correlational scope and also under the design guidelines of a non-experimental design where the measurements took place at specific points in time (cross-sectional data). The sample consisted of 354 adolescents who were selected by an intentional non-probabilistic sampling. The were applied the Child-to-Parent Aggression Questionnaire (CPAQ) proposed by Calvete et al. (2013); the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (Spreng et al., 2009; cited by Nolasco, 2012) to measure empathy; and the Davis scale (1983), which assesses cognitive aspects of empathy. The relationship between variables was established by determining patterns of behaviour whose contents have marked behavioral traits in both the child-parent violence and the adolescent empathy, a thing that permitted the study to obtain a resultant of four different clusters that explain the relationship between the variables of study
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".