Brutalismo doméstico. Un espacio para la contemplación
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La cuestión sobre las futuras formas de habitar fue investigada recientemente por P. Gadanho, \nquien identificó una constelación de arquitectos japoneses que responden a ella mediante unos \nbreves manifiestos y a través de su propia obra. Algunos de estos proyectos son viviendas \nexperimentales que sirven de hilo-conductor a este texto para abordar conceptos como la \nrelación entre naturaleza y arquitectura, la proximidad entre arquitecturas futuras y primitivas, \nlos gradientes espaciales entre el espacio interior y el exterior, la arquitectura como fenómeno \nsocial y el permanente deseo por alcanzar una mayor transparencia y ligereza estructural. \nFinalmente el texto presenta dos obras singulares: la villa Sudbury y la casa de Jesús, que \nofrecen una respuesta local a las cuestiones abordadas anteriormente. La principal idea que \nintroducen es la incorporación de la escala monumental al espacio doméstico, con el fin de \ncrear nuevos espacios completamente libres, inmateriales y puramente contemplativos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".