MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999143699

Bohuslav Kroupa (1838-1912), malíř-cestovatel

2018· dissertation· en· W6999143699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Cultural and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaintingBachelorWork (physics)The artsFocus (optics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bachelor thesis focuses on portraying unpublished data of life and work of a painter Bohuslav Kroupa (1838-1912) whose monograph has not yet been written. The main source of information is his estate, which he bequeathed to the Náprstkovo Museum. Firstly, I will focus on his studies in Prague and the works created under the influence of the professor of the Landscape School Max Haushofer. It will also mention artworks of his classmates. Secondly, I will concentrate on his travels abroad especially to the United States and Canada, which are connected with illustrations for local periodicals. Bohuslav Kroupa also made illustrations for his travel book, published in London in 1890. The aim of the thesis is the overall evaluation of Bohuslav Kroupa's work (including magazines and book illustrations) and his position within fine arts of the second half of the 19th century. Key words Bohuslav Kroupa, 19th century painting, Haushofer's landscape painting school, illustrator, traveller

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it