Clive Robertson : Video clip : An Annotated Bibliography in Real Time : Performance Art in Quebec and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Clive Robertson has curated and performed in England since 1970. In 1972, he co-founded the international performance and publishing collective W.O.R.K.S with Paul Woodrow in Calgary. Roberston is one of the founding publishers of Voicespondence Audio Art Publishing (1972) and Centerfold / FUSE magazine (1976). With Alain-Martin Richard, he edited Performance au / in Canada 1970–1990 (Coach House Press / Éditions Intervention, 1991) and in 2007, he produced THEN + THEN AGAIN: Practices Within An Artist-Run Culture, 1969–2006 / Again and again: the practice in the culture of artist centers, 1969–2006, a traveling exhibition which offers an archival retrospective of his collaborations. He is working on a feature documentary called I.O.60’s (In Our Sixties) where he reconnects with artistic communities in the United Kingdom and Canada. Clive is renown as an authoritative theorist as well as a historian of the culture of artist-run centers. He currently teaches performance art, art history and Cultural Studies at Queens University." -- Publisher's website.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".