Caractérisation du sommeil de patients schizophrènes jamais traités avec des neuroleptiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
III.=DISCUSSION= 48 l.Résumé des résultats de l'article """.".." 48 2. Principales explications 2. l.Trouble des mécanismes veille-sommeil 2.1.1.Difficultés de désengagement des mécanismes de veille.2. l. 2. Difficultés d'engagement des mécanismes de sommeil.2.2.Trouble de contrôle du sommeil 2.2.1.Trouble chronobiologique.2.2.2.Trouble de contrôle du mécanisme SP-OFF 2.2.3.Trouble de contrôle du mécanisme SP-ON 3. Principal problème méthodologique de la présente étude 3.1.Petit nombre d'individus par groupe.. 49 .49_49 _50 .51_51 _ 52 .52 53 53 IV-CONCLUSION.=55 l.Principales implications de la présente étïide___^____^^^____^____^^^__55 2. Recherches futures 56 2.1.Evaluation de l'effet de la détresse psychologique sur le sommeil des .................56 patients schizophrènes 2.2.Utilisation des nouvelles échelles typologiques d'évaluation des symptômes ^....56 de la schizophrénie 2.3.Corrélations entre le sommeil et les performances cognitives des patients...56 schizophrènes 2.4.Analyses quantifiées de l'EEG du sommeil des patients schizophrènes,..............^? 2.5.Etudes neurophysiologiques des mécanismes cholinergiques SP-(9-?V^^^^... ^^.^57 en relation avec les symptômes de la schizophrénie V.===BIBLIOGRAPHIE= =58 J Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS).Results: Patients showed difficulties to initiate and maintain sleep, decreased slow wave sleep duration, and short REM sleep latency, but normal total REM sleep duration and efficiency compared to controls.No difference was found between the two groups concerning sleep spindles and REMs densities.Global severity of symptoms conrelated negatively with REM sleep duration and REMs density.Positive symptoms correlated negatively with REM sleep latency.Conclusions: The present results show that sleep in dmg-naive patients with schizophrenia is characterized by two types of sleep disorders: insomnia-like disorders and abnormalities in nonREM-REM sleep alternations.The observation that sleep parameters correlated with clinical symptoms suggest that common substrates may be involved.We propose to further explore the possibility that sleep disorders contribute to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".