MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999170609

Caracterização de proveniências de Pinus elliottii e Pinus taeda para instalação de ensaios de proveniências

2017· dissertation· pt· W6999170609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositório Comum (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPinus <genus>Yield (engineering)Work (physics)Scots pine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Portugal tem se deparado com um grave problema, que é o Nemátode da Madeira do Pinheiro (NMP), que afeta o Pinheiro Bravo (Pinus pinaster), o que incrementa a necessidade de procurar diversas soluções e o aumento do conhecimento. Assim, com este trabalho pretende-se demonstrar o interesse de avaliar a tolerância/resistência ao nemátode pela instalação de ensaios de espécies e proveniências resistentes ao NMP ou até mesmo a criação de híbridos, com os nossos melhores indivíduos de P. pinaster. Irão ser analisadas duas espécies de Pinus (Pinus elliottii e Pinus taeda), que apresentam resistência ao nemátode, bem como, boa produtividade de madeira e de resina. Estas espécies são originárias da América do Norte (Canadá e Estados Unidos), em regiões onde o NMP é endémico. A utilização de semente ou de plantas melhoradas geneticamente ou de pólen (para constituição de híbridos) e com posterior instalação de ensaios são no conjunto diferentes abordagens que permitem melhorar o nosso conhecimento sobre esta temática. O objetivo deste trabalho é identificar as proveniências de P. elliottii e P. taeda e verificar a viabilidade da importação da semente, para constituição de ensaios com estas espécies e proveniências melhor adaptadas às nossas condições edafo-climáticas. Uma das preocupações é o fato de poderem ser espécies invasoras, no entanto, após estudos realizados verificou-se que isso só tem sido registado em países tropicais e a probabilidade de se tornarem invasoras na Europa é muito reduzida. Posto isto, verificou-se que seria interessante definirem-se os locais em Portugal e instalar ensaios, onde poderíamos testar e avaliar o comportamento de P. pinaster, P. taeda, P. elliottii e mais tarde os respetivos híbridos, selecionando as melhores proveniências e/ou indivíduos, atendendo ao objetivo do produto final (resina/madeira). As sementes deveriam ser importadas da América do Norte (região de origem destas espécies) e do Brasil (áreas importantes de produção das espécies). Em Portugal, os ensaios seriam instalados nas Regiões de Proveniência do Pinheiro Bravo. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Pinus elliottii, Pinus taeda, Pinus pinaster, Nematode da Madeira do Pinheiro. ABSTRACT Portugal has been facing a serious problem, which is the Pine Wood Nematode (PWN) that affects Pinus pinaster and increases the need to seek different solutions and increase the knowledge about it. Thus, this work intends to demonstrate the importance of evaluation the tolerance/resistance to nematode by the establishment of trials of species and provenances resistant to Pine Wood Nematode or even their hybridazation, with our best individuals of Pinus pinaster. Two species of Pinus (Pinus elliottii and Pinus taeda), both showing Nematode resistance, as well as good wood and resin productivity, will be analyzed. These species originate in North America (Canada and the United States) in regions where PWN is endemic. The use of seed or genetically improved plants or pollen (for hybridization) and subsequent installation of tests are altogether different approaches that allow us to improve our knowledge on this subject. The objective of this work is to identify the provenances of P. elliottii and P. taeda and verify the viability of the seed importation, to constitute trials with these species and provenances better adapted to our soil and climatic conditions. One of our concerns is that they may be invasive species. However, different studies have shown that this behavior has only been recorded in tropical countries, the probability of becoming invasive in Europe is very low. After this, it was verified that it would be interesting to identify the sites in Portugal and then after to establish trials with selected provenances, where we could assay and evaluate the behavior of P. pinaster, P. taeda, P. elliottii and later the respective hybrids, selecting the best provenances and/or individuals, taking into account the objective of the final product (resin/wood). The seeds should be imported from North America (region of origin of these species) and Brazil (important areas of wood and resin production of these species). In Portugal, the trials should be installed in the Regions of Provenances of Pinus pinaster. KEYWORDS: Pinus elliottii, Pinus taeda, Pinus pinaster, Pine Wood Nematode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositório Comum (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal)Same topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207