The 2001 Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and Aircraft Equipment Protocol: Internationalising Asset-Based Financing Principles for the Acquisition of Aircraft and Engines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O N NOVEMBER 16, 2001, delegations from 68 States and 14 international organizations,' meeting in diplomatic conference in Cape Town, South Africa, adopted the Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment 2 and the Aircraft Equipment Protocol 3 thereto.4 This event was particularly noteworthy for a number of reasons: it was the first major diplomatic conference ever held in South Africa's "mother city" and the first time that Cape Town has given its name to an international treaty; it broke new ground in enshrining assetbased financing principles in a multilateral treaty applicable to aircraft and engines; it demonstrated unprecedented cooperation between the International Institute for the Unification of * Mr. Clark is Senior International Adviser to the UK aviation law firm Beaumont and Son, former Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of IATA and Head of the IATA Delegation to the Cape Town Diplomatic Conference, and former Ambassador of Canada to several countries. I Diplomatic Conference to Adopt a Mobile Equipment Convention and an Aircraft Protocol, Cape Town, South Africa,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".