MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999316340

Community Involvement in Mine Remediation: Insights from Northwest Territories, Canada

2022· dissertation· en· W6999316340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCommunity engagementLocal communityClosure (psychology)Public participationCapacity buildingFocus groupPublic engagementNeglect
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Across Canada and the Northwest Territories (NWT), abandoned mines have held their place as literal and figurative memories of historical mining malpractices, with mine closure and remediation in Northern areas gaining traction in Canada to bring environmental, economic, and social restitution from years of neglect and land misuse. However, the focus on technical aspects of mine closure have historically limited the extent to which local engagement is considered in the planning phases of mine closure and remediation. This thesis examines the characteristics of good practices for Northern community engagement in mine remediation, and, specifically, how the Giant Mine Remediation Project (GMRP) in Yellowknife, NWT has employed community engagement throughout the planning stages. Methods included a review of project remediation documents, informed by good-practice principles for public and Indigenous engagement. Results of this study indicate that the GMRP largely considers public engagement within its planning stages. However, fair and open dialogue, along with adequate and accessible information between Developer and the public were least evident. Further, capacity building for Indigenous Peoples and communities lacked fulsome consideration specifically in planning documents. The conclusions support similar findings that Indigenous communities require greater financial resources to build capacity and meaningful incorporation of traditional knowledge. Indicators of success and public oversight committees may provide greater opportunity to strengthen local knowledge and participation in the remediation phase of the mine cycle. While this project is limited in scope, it is hoped these findings will aid in enhancing the effectiveness of community engagement in Northern mine remediation and Indigenous participation, while demonstrating the success that the regulatory regime in the NWT and Northern Canada has in developing greater public participation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0340.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Same topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207