MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999352250

Comparación de la biomasa de dos cultivares de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) de distintos orígenes, plantados en Chirgua, estado Carabobo, Venezuela

2013· article· en· W6999352250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarBiomass (ecology)CropSolanum tuberosumGrowing seasonPhotosynthesis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biomass crops such as the potato ( Solanum tuberosum check for this species in other resources L.), is the sign of the potential of photosynthesis and accumulation of assimilates in plants. In the present study evaluated the effect on the development of the biomass of two potato varieties, from Argentina and Canada and which are used in commercial crops, in Chirgua, Carabobo state. The design of the experiment was blocks at random with 2 x 2 factorial arrangement, the cultivars "Kennebec" and "Atlantic" and the two origins. Weekly, assessed the formation of aerial biomass and tubers, relationship it with the time of growth. The rate of growth of the crop (RGC) and harvest index (HI) were estimated. The plants were harvested and sectioned in its different bodies, for their biomass. Analysis of variance and mean comparisons, using Tukey's test were carried out. The distribution of biomass and the number of organs during development of the crop were obtained. Biomass and number of organs showed different behaviors that depended on the origin, the cultivar and its relationship. The CRG was to increase and with variations. HI did not present differences, due to the low leaf area. Total biomass ranged between 114 and 1322 g m-2, is also associated with the quality of the "seed", origin and different ages, influencing the growth of plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207