Complex of multipurpose buildings in Klaipeda old town.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the research: to prepare a project of an urban complex in Klaipda old town, having assessed the current building up, management, usage, engineering infrastructure, values of cultural heritage, visual landscape properties and context environment of the territory. Objectives of the research: to plan the building of a city quarter with regard to local history, to manage environment, to create public spaces, to make landscape of the quarter attractive not only to residents but also to city guests, also to provide conditions for development of commercial, residential and public purposes. The result of the work: a designed multifunctional complex of buildings including a detailed exhibition pavilion and a square. Textual and graphical parts as well as a model of an urban complex have been prepared. Methods of research: a multifunctional complex of buildings in Klaipda old town has been designed on the basis of the task for the Bachelor’s Thesis on design of an urban complex and currently valid normative and methodical materials. Structure of the Thesis: the analysed situation of the territory under planning and its current state, prepared conceptions and a plan of the building up and management of the territory, architectural and constructional solutions for the exhibition pavilion have been prepared.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".