Colapso iminente: uma análise da reprodução da racionalidade neoliberal no governo do RS frente a Covid-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present research aims to contribute to the neoliberal rationality embedded in governance debate, specifically in the field of Covid-19 struggle politics, knowing that a critical moment (BOLTANSKI E THÉVENOT, 1999) was constructed in all societies. Our main objective was to analyze how the influence from the neoliberal rationality was embedded in the government management from the governor of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Eduardo Leite, through his political speech in their official lives of government pages (Facebook/Youtube). In the specific objectives, we analyzed how \nthe governor speeches could be related to themes in the Covid 19 pandemic combat, involving dualities that might represent or not an neoliberal rationality, created through our theoretical references, mainly Brown (2020), Foucault (1982; 2008), Dardot & Laval (2016 a e b; 2019 a e b), Anderson (1999) and Gros (2008). We also analyzed the top two Think Tanks of RS, to relationate them with the content of the lives from the governor. To execute this research we utilizate an thematic analysis (BARDIN, 1977) of qualitative nature to study the Lives and Think Tanks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".