MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6999499437

Constructing living bridges: learning to listen to culture in an indigenous pre-school

2015· dissertation· en· W6999499437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousParticipatory action researchNarrativeGeneral partnershipIdentity (music)Qualitative researchAction researchEarly childhoodEarly childhood educationExperiential learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis dissertation begins from acknowledging the close relationship between culture and learning. Despite the plethora of research in pre-school education with respect to culture, the question remains how to translate what is known about early education into specific communities when their pursuit is to maintain cultural identity. This longitudinal study, carried out in partnership with Step by Step Child and Family Center, recounts a three year story of a First Nations (Mohawk) early childhood center in Quebec that actively followed their quest for innovative ways to maintain culture through their early childhood programs. The research commenced with the provocation of the Reggio Emilia approach. Initial research questions focused on where Reggio Emilia principles might resonate with Mohawk culture. However, in the course of inquiry, cultural ownership emerged as core learning, providing a major turning point in the inquiry. With the construction of children’s art studios (ateliers) in the Center, new research questions developed. What role would the arts play in developing Mohawk culture and identity in their early childhood program? The qualitative study drew on various qualitative approaches: participatory action research, narrative inquiry, grounded theory, arts-informed methods and Indigenous research. Indigenous ontological and epistemological values were fundamental in grounding and directing this study respectfully and in honor of the Indigenous participants. The study combined multiple data sources: classroom observation, teacher and researcher documentation of changing practices, photographs, interviews and focus groups. Over three years and three distinct phases, the research partnership involved 3 administrators, 10 teachers and 160 children (aged 18 months to 5 years). The phases unfolded over 320 hours of field work conducted in collaboration with the Center. The research process afforded opportunities over time to together develop a “pedagogy of listening”, which became the guiding theoretical and methodological orientation of the study, as symbolized through the “living bridge”: the conduit that carried the researcher back and forth to the community.The findings give rise to substantial implications for teaching and learning in early childhood arenas and better understanding what it means to develop “culturally relevant” programs. The emphasis on the arts played a major role in the development of a culturally relevant curriculum due to their experiential nature and sharing in Indigenous approaches of holistic and traditional learning. The thesis contends that children’s and teacher’s simultaneous inquiry can provide meaningful learning through mutual engagement. Providing children with opportunities to revisit their learning, accompanied by teachers’ documentation and sharing, came together to uphold goals of a culturally authentic and relevant program, thus holding significant implications for teacher professional development, teacher education as well as early childhood curriculum, especially for other Indigenous communities searching for ways to maintain cultural traditions and identity. The research may provide a framework for suitable entry into conversations focused on a process-oriented pedagogy grounded in cultural values. The study also contributes to current research on cultural values and the Reggio Emilia approach, revealing when and how Reggio principles could be used as provocation and when the approach needed to be set aside. Most importantly, the development of practice of a pedagogy of listening, threaded throughout this dissertation, might illuminate ways of cultivating collegial learning within early childhood communities whereby values, beliefs, and goals can be listened to attentively, reflected upon, and shared, leading to authentic, sustainable change for the benefit of all.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→