MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999536498

Comparative study of conventional physiotherapy,electromyography (emg) biofeedback andisokinetic exercise interventionin person sufferingosteoarthritis of knee

2016· other· en· W6999536498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePadua@thesis (Department of Information Engineering University of Padova) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiofeedbackElectromyographyOsteoarthritisRehabilitationIsokinetic ExerciseIntervention (counseling)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study was undertaken with an objective to To compare the effectiveness of conventional physiotherapy, electromyography (EMG) biofeedback and isokinetic exercise intervention on person suffering osteoarthritis (OA) of knee. Twenty eight cases on osteoarthritis of knee from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) in the age above 50 years old are involved. All cases involved then assessed with Western Ontario And Mcmaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire, peak torque using Biodex 4 Isokinetic machine, Standing force and knee joint force using Force Platform And 3Dimensional (3D) Qualisys Track Manager software and muscle activation using electromyoghaphy (EMG). These assessments were done for the screening test and preintervention base line information. Thereafter they were randomly and equally categorized into three groups, viz. - Group A (N=9)- consist of control group received conventional physiotherapy exercise intervention; Group B (N=9) — received electromyography (EMG) biofeedback exercise intervention and Group C (N=10) — received isokinetic exercise intervention. Group wise respective intervention trainings were imparted for 20 sessions (45- 60 min.s /day; 2 days/ week for 10 weeks). Post-term analyses on all of the variables assessed in the pre-intervention phase were done on all of the cases after the completion of 10 weeks of intervention. Findings of this present study clarified that, although all of the interventions had beneficial impacts, EMG biofeedback intervention was observed as most effective in enhancement of muscle potentiality, while conventional exercise also was observed as having satisfactory outcomes. Further to that, compared to other intervention techniques, EMG biofeedback was also observed as mostly suitable in modulating fatigability in the subjects while Isokinetic training also were observed to have slight improvement in fatigue management. EMG biofeedback was also observed to improve in peak torque; while Isokinetic intervention was not at all beneficial for improvement in peak torque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePadua@thesis (Department of Information Engineering University of Padova)French-language works237,207