MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999537360

Cultural contacts between communities of southwestern Romania and the central Balkans in the fourth millennium BC

2022· article· en· W6999537360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRAI - Repository of the Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)ChalcolithicPotteryBeakerExcavationBronzeBronze Age
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the beginning of fourth millennium BC, after the disintegration of the Bubanj-Sǎlcuţa-Krivodol cultural complex, the so-called Transitional period from the Eneolithic to the Bronze Age began in the territory of Oltenia (western Bulgaria and Serbia). We still lack a lot of data about this period. In northwestern Bulgaria this period is defined by the Galatin group, and in Romania by the Sǎlcuţa IV group, while in Serbia it is almost completely unknown. Stratigraphical observations from new excavations (2008 to 2014) at the Bubanj site near Niš in southeastern Serbia suggest that elements of Bubanj-Hum I culture lasted longer there than in Oltenia and western Bulgaria, and that the hiatus between this culture and the Cernavodǎ III culture was very short. Excavations at the Mokranjske stene site in eastern Serbia, where the Coţofeni cultural layer lies directly above the Bubanj-Hum I culture layer, provide similar evidence. After this period, i.e. in the last quarter of the fourth millennium, it is possible again to notice some kind of cultural integration in the territory where the BSK complex previously existed. Across the vast territory from Transylvania in the north, across the Oltenia and eastern Serbia to southeastern Serbia to the south, almost identical stylistic and typological elements can be observed in the pottery record. According to recent absolute dates from Serbian sites, this cultural phenomenon can be chronologically defined starting from the end of the third quarter of fourth millennium BC, namely Cernavodǎ III culture. The situation is similar in the next period (last quarter of the fourth and first quarter of the third millennium BC), when Coţofeni and Kostolac societies met in the area of the Iron Gates and eastern Serbia, creating a new cultural phenomenon defined as Coţofeni-Kostolac culture. A significant proportion of the stylistic and typological elements of this culture are identical to those originating on Coţofeni territories in Oltenia and Transylvania. The impacts of these cultures reached far to the south, all the way to the Aegean coast, but in the late Eneolithic, Vucedol culture came to be a significant influence on the cultural milieu of the central Balkans. On the other hand, after the demise of Vucedol culture (second half of the third millennium BC), the Balkans became largely influenced by Aegean civilisation, which significantly contributed to the appearance of early Bronze Age cultures in the Balkans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRAI - Repository of the Institute of Archaeology, BelgradeSame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207