Den tidlige kirkeorganisasjonen i Nidaros bispedømme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we have examined the emergence of a public church organization in the diocese of Nidaros 1000–1250. The two levels in the earliest church system – the county churches of the king and bishops and the proprietary churches of the secular elite – differ from other dioceses, such as in Bergen, where we have found that three organizational levels – county churches, quarter churches and eight churches – were already in place early in the 1000s. We suggest that this is due to the relatively later Christianization of most of the diocese of Nidaros. In contrast to the other dioceses, only a time-limited maintenance obligation of the proprietary churches was imposed on the common people in Nidaros. On the other hand, they were obliged to construct and to a certain extent ensure the maintenance of the county churches. Our investigation has identified 23 probable county churches in the diocese.We point out that the counties were the first subdeaneries, and that from the thirteenth century onwards these were subdivided into decreasingly smaller subdeaneries with new main churches. Only in the far north was the old system of very large parishes maintained, in Trondenes and Tromsø, probably for financial reasons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".