Die Vereinten Nationen vor globalen Herausforderungen : Referate der Potsdamer UNO-Konferenzen 2000–2008
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Manuel FrhlichEs gehrt zu den gngigen Metaphern gerade der politischen Berichterstattung, die Mhen von Vernderungsprozessen mit dem Verweis auf die Echternacher Springprozession zu illustrieren: Drei Schritte vor und zwei zurck.So, wie sich traditionellerweise die Glubigen zu Ehren des Heiligen Willibrord bewegten, so mute auch manch politische Dynamik von Reformprozessen an.Betrachtet man die Reformdebatte im Vorfeld des Millennium+5-Gipfels im September 2005, so mag einem auch ein Dreischritt auffallen: Zunchst die deutliche Rede des UN-Generalsekretrs vom September 2003, in der er von der Infragestellung des Grndungskonsenses der Vereinten Nationen sprach und angesichts des Irak-Krieges und neuer Sicherheitsbedrohungen ein Highlevel-Panel einsetzte, das konkrete Reformmanahmen
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".