MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999736050

The development of self-definition and relatedness from adolescence through adulthood

2014· dissertation· en· W6999736050 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalityPersonality developmentAnxietyBig Five personality traitsTraitDependency (UML)Adult developmentInterpersonal communication
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-definition and relatedness are fundamental personality developmental tasks that engage individuals across the entire lifespan (Blatt, 1974, Blatt & Luyten, 2009; Luyten & Blatt, 2013). Healthy psychological maturation requires the development of a sense of self that is differentiated, integrated, and positive, and the ability to form close interpersonal relationships that are mature, intimate, mutually satisfying, and reciprocal. A failure or delay in the development of self-definition contributes to the development of a personality trait labelled self-criticism, whereas a failure or delay in the development of relatedness contributes to the development of a personality style labelled dependency. This thesis expands contributes to our knowledge of personality development across the lifespan. In articles 1 and 2, 200 young adults completed measures of recalled parenting and peer relationships as well as a measure of their current levels of self-criticism and dependency. In article 1, I provide the first evidence that highly self-critical young adults recall higher levels of peer victimization in adolescence, over and above their recalled parenting experiences. In article 2, I extend this to dependency by showing that highly dependent young adults recall poorer quality attachments to their peers during adolescence, again over and above their experiences with their parents. In order to longitudinally confirm the effects of a variety of experiences (e.g., parents, peers, romantic partners, siblings, and academic achievement) on dependency and self-criticism in adolescence, I then examine the effects of these experiences on change in dependency and self-criticism, and the role these two personality factors play in the development of depressive and anxiety symptoms. In article 3, 276 early adolescents completed a measure of self-criticism and dependency as well as measures of depressive and anxiety symptoms at baseline and again two years later. Every three months during the study interval, they completed measures of common negative life events and hassles. Results showed that events coded as self-definitional uniquely predicted increases in self-criticism, which in turn predicted increases in depressive symptoms. In contrast, events coded as relatedness-oriented uniquely predicted increases in dependency, which in turn uniquely predicted the development of anxiety symptoms.Finally, in study 4, I provide the first test of lifespan developmental hypotheses of self-definition and relatedness. One Canadian sample and one multicultural sample ranging in age from 18 to 59 completed measures of self-criticism, dependency, neuroticism, agreeableness, and depressive symptoms. Results showed that, adjusting for depressive symptoms as well as neuroticism and agreeableness, older age was linearly associated with improvements in both self-definition and relatedness from age 18 to 59. This pattern of age-related differences was seen in both Western and Eastern cultural samples, suggesting that effects are due to change over time, rather than cohort effects. I then discuss the contributions of these studies to our understanding of personality development across the lifespan. In particular, results suggest that that a variety of developmental experiences, including peers, parents, romantic partners, and academic accomplishments, affect personality development. Furthermore, personality development may affected by experiences that are congruent with specific personality factors. Finally, results suggest that personality is not set by a certain age, but rather continues to evolve across adulthood. I also propose potential explanations for the variety of effects shown. I address the limitations to these studies, and conclude by outlining avenues for future research, as well as the implications of these findings for clinical interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyFrench-language works237,207