MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6999781915

De rol van pectine polysachariden bij het hard-to-cook probleem van gewone bonen

2015· article· en· W6999781915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLirias (KU Leuven) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPectinSugarJAMSPolysaccharideAdded sugar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in addressing food insecurity and protein-energy malnutrition cannot be underestimated. However, their utilization is hampered by the occurrence of the hard-to-cook (HTC) phenomenon, a condition in which seeds do not imbibe sufficient water during soaking (hard-shell effect) and do not become tender after a reasonable cooking time (HTC defect). Various hypotheses have been postulated to explain the occurrence of the HTC defect, including a well-supported hypothesis involving pectin i.e. the classical pectin hypothesis. Nevertheless, the mechanisms through which pectic polysaccharides are involved in the HTC defect have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this research work was to gain detailed mechanistic insights into the role of pectic polysaccharides in the development and manifestation of the HTC defect in common beans by evaluating the classical pectin hypothesis. In preliminary work, selected common beans were classified into either easy-to-cook (ETC) or HTC based on their cooking quality. Furthermore, factors affecting the cooking quality of common beans such as soaking in various brine solutions were explored. From the selected common bean samples, Rose coco, Red haricot, Zebra beans were classified as ETC, while Canadian wonder, Pinto and Soya fupi beans were classified as HTC. In addition, the influence of salts solutions and solutions of different pH on the texture of beans during soaking and thermal treatment pointed at the possible involvement of pectin in the cooking quality of common beans. Subsequently the classical pectin hypothesis was evaluated by examining pectic polysaccharide properties such as sugar composition, degree of methyl-esterification (DM), extractability and molar mass (MM). Differences in pectic polysaccharide properties between ETC and HTC beans were investigated as well as the effect of storage conditions and (pre)treatments on the pectic polysaccharide properties in relation to the development and manifestation of the HTC defect. It was revealed that common bean pectic polysaccharides have relatively higher amounts of neutral sugars, especially arabinose and galactose, compared to the amounts of galacturonic acid and therefore rather highly branched. Moreover, HTC bean pectic polysaccharides are more branched than the ETC beans, especially for the Na2CO3 extractable pectin (NEP). Development of the HTC defect during storage of beans at high temperature (35 °C) and/or relative humidity (83%) was accompanied by a decrease in hot water pectin extractability paralleled by an increase in the alkaline extractable fraction. On the other hand, the amounts of chelator extractable pectin (CEP) for ETC and HTC beans were similar. However, upon soaking and thermal treatment in a solution of Na2CO3, extractability profile of the pectic polysaccharides shifted, the water extractable pectin (WEP) increased while NEP decreased, for both ETC and HTC beans. This observation can be attributed to thermal solubilisation, mainly for the strongly bound NEP, and hence conversion of part of NEP into WEP. This was reflected in enhanced cell separation during cooking due to weak cell-cell adhesion. In contrast, such changes were not observed in samples soaked and thermally treated in a CaCl2 solution, the cell walls disintegrated on grinding due to strong cell-cell adhesive forces. The observed changes in pectic polysaccharides extractability during storage and (pre)treatments were in line with the cooking behaviour of the beans. ETC beans and Na2CO3 treated beans showed minimum cooking time, while HTC beans and CaCl2 treated beans took a longer time to cook. Other pectin characteristics such as DM of the AIR and MM distribution of water extractable polymers did not differ considerably between the ETC beans and HTC beans. However, soaking and thermal treatment in a Na2CO3 solution considerably reduced the DM of the AIR. In conclusion, contribution of pectic polysaccharides to the development of the HTC defect is majorly due to reduced pectin extractability. However, the decrease cannot be explained solely by the classical pectin hypothesis. In contrast to the hypothesis, the DM and the amounts of CEP did not differ considerably between ETC and HTC common beans. Therefore, the decrease in pectin extractability is probably not as a result of PME catalysed pectin demethoxylation but could be due to the release of Ca++ that subsequently cross-links with already lowly methylesterified pectin. However, the occurrence of non-Ca++ cross-links cannot be ruled out. Therefore, in this PhD work an alternative hypothesis is proposed. The decrease in extractability of pectin is probably also due to the possible occurrence of strongly covalent ester links, since, breakage of ester links is crucial for solubilisation of pectin during cooking. With the revealed structure of common bean pectin, especially high level branching of the strongly bound pectins (NEP) in form of arabinans, the following possible ester cross-links can occur: (i) ferulic acid bridges esterified to neutral sugar side chains, (ii) rhamnogalacturonan-II borate diester, and (iii) uronyl ester linkages between carboxyl group of galacturonic acid and hydroxyl group of another glycosyl residue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLirias (KU Leuven)→Same topicFood composition and properties→French-language works237,207→