MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999795812

Diffraction imaging of subsea permafrost discontinuities

2023· other· en· W6999795812 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostDeformation (meteorology)SlumpingHeat flow
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laterally discontinuous subsea permafrost is present in the Arctic along the Beaufort Sea margin. Discontinuities within the permafrost include unfrozen zones from which fluids are free to migrate vertically or laterally, potentially accelerating permafrost degradation. This process releases greenhouse gases that further contribute to global warming. Generally, because of its contrasting viscoelastic properties compared to unfrozen sediments, permafrost can be easily detected by seismic methods. A discontinuity in subsea permafrost corresponds to the termination of a frozen layer. At this termination, seismic energy is diffracted rather than reflected or refracted. This condition is well suited for diffraction imaging. Here, we present a processing workflow to identify subsea permafrost discontinuities using the diffracted wavefield. This workflow aims to extract diffractions from seismic data collected on the continental shelf of the Canadian Beaufort Sea. The shallow water environment combined with the occurrence of subsea permafrost generates highly energetic free surface multiples that overprinted diffractions. Thus, preliminary steps of the processing flow focused on multiple attenuation. A recursive velocity analysis, starting with a 100 common-midpoint (CMP) interval and ending with a 5 CMP interval, is also performed to better capture lateral permafrost discontinuities. Then, the full wavefield data are migrated, collapsing the energy distributed along the hyperbolic trajectory of the diffractions at their apexes. Afterwards, reflections are adaptively subtracted from the migrated data. Finally, demigration of the residuals (i.e., collapsed diffractions) is performed. The resulting image reveals several near-surface diffractions attributed to discontinuities at the top of the subsea permafrost. Diffractions present distinct amplitude, frequency and velocity characteristics suggesting that various permafrost conditions coexist across the continental shelf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR)French-language works237,207