Development of Be(x)Zn(1âx)O Nanowires for Radiation Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction and photoluminescence measurements\nwere conducted on Be(x)Zn(1âx)O nanowires prepared by electrochemical and hydrothermal\ndeposition to study their morphology, structure and optical properties. The bowing\nparameter for nanowires prepared by electrochemical and hydrothermal deposition was\nfound to be 4.8 eV and 3.6 eV, respectively. It was observed that for electrochemical deposition,\nit is more difficult for Be(2+) to incorporate in the crystal lattice than Zn(2+). The electrochemical deposited samples exhibited stronger\ndeep level emissions, indicating a higher density of deep level states. A home-made Optically\nStimulated Luminescence (OSL) system was successfully constructed and calibrated\nwith Al2O3:C and BeO. The OSL lifetime measurements on electrochemical deposited\nsamples showed there were measurable OSL signals even on 500 nm long Be(x)Zn(1âx)O\nnanowires. The lifetimes of these OSL signals were found to decrease with increasing Be\nconcentration. Be(x)Zn(1âx)O nanowires show considerable promise as new OSL materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".