MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999886419

DESIGN HARNESSING HOT SPRING’S ENERGY SYSTEM FOR COCOA BEANS DRYING

2009· other· en· W6999886419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUTPedia (Universiti Teknologi Petronas) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy (signal processing)GreenhouseElectricityEnergy sourceGeothermal energyThermal energyAlternative energySystems designEnergy conservationEnergy requirement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geothermal energy is a one type source of alternative energy. Countries like United Stated, Australia, New Zealand, China, Canada and Turkey have used this energy for some applications such as for electricity generation, space and district heating, air conditioning, greenhouse heating and others. The presence of volcanoes, hot springs and other thermal phenomena lead people to explore and study energy produced inside earth. In Malaysia, there are also some places have the hot springs in Tambun, Sungkai, Pengkalan Hulu, Manong and others and currently use for recreation and tourism. For this project, the author wants to study and understanding this one type of alternative energy and design suitable system to harness hot spring’s energy and used for cocoa beans drying (industrial application). The problems that are being created from energy price hiking and our equator climate lead the author to find the solutions. The target is to design a suitable system which can harness hot spring’s energy and applied it on cocoa beans drying process. Since the energy is free and continuously produced inside the earth, the author wants to find the way how to commercial the energy. The important elements that need to be determine before starts the design is the behaviour of cocoa beans while drying and the unknowns related to the design that must being determine using the experiment and engineering calculations. The design must be in details for future works. This project can solve the problems of inconsistently weather condition and high price for fuel and gas that being used for artificial drying. This project also can make improvement with maximizing the quantity of the dried cocoa beans without affecting the quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUTPedia (Universiti Teknologi Petronas)Same topicHygrothermal properties of building materialsFrench-language works237,207