MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999901825

Economic burden in patients with first episode psychosis and difficult to treat schizophrenia related disorders : a study in an Indian setting

2024· other· en· W6999901825 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWarwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTata TrustsUniversity of WarwickNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Indirect costsPsychosisEconomic costHealth careMedical costsMental healthTotal cost
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patients suffering from psychotic disorders in Low - and Middle - Income Countries (LMICs) face tremendous challenges in meeting their health care needs. The economic costs associated with these disorders put a huge burden on families which results in financial distress. However , compared to diseases such as t uberculosis, there is limited evidence on extent, timing and drivers of such costs, and level of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) that results. Methods : The NIHR Warwick - India - Canada Psychosis Global Research Group ( WIC - Warwick India Canada ) conduct ed research in two separate but linked patient groups – First Episode Psychosis (FEP) and “difficult - to treat” schizophrenia (dSZ). A cost questionnaire specifically for mental health was developed in this study and WIC (Warwick India Canada) study participants were interviewed at 1 - month and 6 - months post recruitment. Research Questions : What costs are incurred by patients with psychosis and their households in India? What package of care is involv ed in i) diagnosis and treatment of FEP and ii) management of those with difficult to treat schizophrenia, and what are the resources required to deliver this package of care? Results : Mean total costs in month one in OPD were INR 7991 ($107.5) for FE P . I ndirect costs were 78.3% of this total. The direct cost incurred during treatment for dSZ in OPD amounted to INR 3526.36 ($47.4 ) . M ean indirect cost per month was INR 7649.2 or ( $ 103 ) which was 68.4% of total cost and productivity losses were 40.6% of the indirect cost . M ean total cost of dSZ pe r admission was INR 57800.83 ($780.3) in which mean direct expense s incurred w ere INR 14791.6 ($200.0) i.e. 25.6% and mean indirect costs were INR 43009.5 ($578.3) i.e. 74.5% of total. Impact : The findings will be helpful in establishing health and financing strategies by estimating the economic burden of patients with FEP and dSZ and protect ing financially vulnerable households with members requiring mental health care. Moreover, in the absence of health insurance for treatment of mental disorders and other welfare benefits, this study is of immense importance to measure cost barriers in accessing mental health care for patients and inform current mental health care strategies to increase service us age .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWarwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)French-language works237,207