The Dutch Reformed Church from "Human Relations and the South African Scene in the Light of Scripture" to "Church and Society": the struggle goes on

In the recent history of the Dutch Reformed Church two documents played an important role. The
\ndocuments were Human Relations and the South African Scene in the Light of Scripture of 1974
\nand Church and Society of 1986. The first document stated the policy of the church on apartheid
\nand defended the policy on biblical grounds. The second document constituted the first step the
\nchurch took away from the policy of apartheid. The aim of this article is to follow the journey
\nwhich the Dutch Reformed Church undertook from Human Relations and the South African Scene
\nin the Light of Scripture to Church and Society. It starts with the origins of Human Relations and
\nthe South African Scene in the Light of Scripture, describing how the document’s roots go all the
\nway back to the Cottesloe consultation of 1960. It also focuses on the reception of Human
\nRelations and the South African Scene in the Light of Scripture before describing four important
\nimpulses that played a major part in forcing the Dutch Reformed Church to rethink its policy on
\napartheid. These impulses were the Reformed day Witness of 1980, the Open Letter of 1982, the
\nmeeting of the World Alliance of Churches in Ottawa, Canada 1982 and the status confessionis of
\nthe Dutch Reformed Missions Church in October 1982 which resulted in the Confession of
\nBelhar. These impulses led to the decision during the 1982 General Synod of the Dutch Reformed
\nChurch to revise Human Relations and the South African Scene in the Light of Scripture. The
\noutcome of this decision was the acceptance of a new document called Church and Society in
\n1986. The article highlights the important decisions in this new document which constituted a
\nbreak with the former biblical founding of apartheid in Human Relations and the South African
\nScene in the Light of Scripture. Open church doors, open membership, no biblical prohibition of
\nmixed marriages and critical voice against apartheid, are examples of a new policy which showed
\nthat the Dutch Reformed Church was on a different road. The reception of this new document
\nconfirmed this by bringing the church in turmoil which led to a schism in the church and the
\nfounding of the Afrikaanse Protetsantse Kerk in 1987. The struggle of the Dutch Reformed
\nChurch did however not stop with the acceptance of Church and Society and the reaction of 1987.
\nIn 1990 the General Synod of the church confirmed the policy of the church as stated in Church
\nand Society of 1986 but also made certain revisions which stated the church’s critique on
\napartheid much clearer. The 1990 document stated that “the church made the error of allowing
\nforced separation and division of peoples in its own circle, to be considered a biblical narrative”.
\nThe unjust system of apartheid was clearly condemned by the synod and although it also declared
\nthat not everything could be branded as wrong and inhuman. The article concludes by accepting
\nthat Church and Society was not the perfect document and certainly not the perfect answer the
\nworld demanded from the Dutch Reformed Church. It was however a small step in the right
\ndirection of a new journey, away form the biblical founding of apartheid towards justice and
\nreconciliation, a journey which led to the Rustenburg Church conference in 1990, the so called
\nGeneral Synod of reconciliation in 1994 and onwards, a journey on which the struggle continues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.