Electron Antineutrino Search at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Upper limits on the v¯e flux at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory have been set based on the v¯e charged-current reaction on deuterium. The reaction produces a positron and two neutrons in coincidence. This distinctive signature allows a search with very low background for v¯e’s from the \nSun and other potential sources. Both differential and integral limits on the v¯e flux have been placed in the energy range from 4 – 14.8 MeV. For an energy-independent ve -> v¯e conversion mechanism, the integral limit on the flux of solar v¯e’s in the energy range from 4 – 14.8 MeV is found to be Φv¯e ≤ 3.4 × 104cm−2s−1 (90% C.L.), which corresponds to 0.81% of the standard \nsolar model 8B e flux of 5.05 × 106cm−2s−1, and is consistent with the more sensitive limit from KamLAND in the 8.3 – 14.8 MeV range of 3.7×102cm−2s−1 (90% C.L.). In the energy range from 4 – 8 MeV, a search for v¯e’s is conducted using coincidences in which only the two neutrons are \ndetected. Assuming a v¯e spectrum for the neutron induced fission of naturally occurring elements, a flux limit of Φv¯e 2.0 × 106cm−2s−1 (90% C.L.) is obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".