MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7000004644

Elucidating Anthropogenic Impacts On Water Quality Through Spatial Heterogeneity In The Laurentian Great Lakes And The Global Fast Fashion Industry

2024· other· en· W7000004644 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des ParcsMinistry of Environment
KeywordsEutrophicationWater qualitySustainabilitySpatial heterogeneityWater resourcesProduction (economics)Water pollutionWater supply
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freshwater resources are vital for human survival including for consumption, transportation, and production of goods. We explore the impact of anthropogenic activity on water quality through: 1) the spatial heterogeneity in the northern nearshore regions of the Canadian Great Lakes and 2) the state of fast fashion in the top garment producing countries: China, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Turkey, India, and Indonesia. Water quality conditions varied spatially from oligotrophic conditions in Lake Superior to eutrophic conditions with elevated concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll-a in Lake Erie. Further, we found that policy, sustainability and wastewater are key research areas in the top garment-producing countries. However, there was variation in the number of publications, terminology, knowledge gaps, and barriers that impede more sustainable garment production in the top garment-producing countries. We suggest investments in management and education to protect and use our freshwater resources more sustainably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→