MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000073025

âEach has a house of her ownâ: Purpose, Domesticity and Agency of First Nations Women in Canadaâs Industrial School System, 1883-1923.

2014· article· en· W7000073025 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal System (Mount Royal University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsECW Press (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpposition (politics)House of CommonsGirlAgency (philosophy)Principal (computer security)CommonsArgument (complex analysis)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industrial schools for Aboriginal peoples of the Canadian Northwest were 8irst 1 seriously debated in Canada's House of Commons in 1883.After learning the proposed sum of the cost for building the schools, leader of the Liberal opposition Mr. Edward Blake asked his colleagues what the general purpose and goals were for the system and whether females would be required to attend.When Sir Hector Langevin, M.P., responded that the schools were intended for male children with their principal instruction being the cultivation of soil, Blake responded with a justi8ication for the education of First Nations women: "[i]f the hon.gentleman is going to leave the young Indian girl who is to mature into a squaw to have the uncivilized habits of the tribe, the Indian, when he marries will likely be pulled into Indian savagery with her."This argument apparently carried weight. 2From the 1830s to the 1990s, as part of an attempt to assimilate and "civilize" First Nations peoples into the dominant Euro--Canadian society, young Aboriginal women across Canada were sent to schools away from their families, homes and nations to learn how to become "proper" wives, mothers and homemakers.In an attempt to better understand the reasons behind and the impact of enrolling female students in the schools, this study analyzes one era and regional focus of the industrial school system-the Canadian Prairies from 1883 when the 8irst industrial schools were established in the west, until 1923, when industrial schools were merged with boarding schools into a newly--designed "residential school" system.Speci8ically, the focus 3 will be the 8irst three industrial schools created, which laid the foundation for the system in the west (including British Columbia): the High River Industrial School in what is now 4 Alberta; and the Qu' Appelle Industrial School and the Battleford Industrial School in Saskatchewan.Two leading questions have shaped this study.First, this paper interrogates the various churches' and government's goals for female students in the industrial schools of western Canada.This study argues that the Canadian federal government's and various churches' goals for the female students were twofold.Initially the purpose of education for the female student was to create "proper" wives for the male students who would stand in place of the "non--educated" and "unassimilated" First Nations females who would In this paper the terms "Aboriginal" or "Native" will be utilized when referring to the Indigenous 1 peoples of Canada.There are some instances when terms such as "squaw" or "Indian" appear, but this will be as a result of contemporary labels of Indigenous peoples in the late 19 th and early 20 th centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal System (Mount Royal University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207