Efectividad de la práctica de anticoagulación en la disminución de la tromboembolia durante la oxigenación de la membrana extracorpórea ( ECMO ) venosa arterial en pacientes sometidos a cirugía cardiaca
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of the anticoagulation practice in the reduction of thromboembolism during the oxygenation of the venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane (ECMO) in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Material and Methods: Design a systematic review, quantitative type.The population 80 articles, the sample 10 scientific articles, from the databases: Pub Med, Wolters Kluwer, Ovid insights.Methodological design 20% systematic review, 20% systematic review, metaanalysis and series of cases, 40% cohorts, 20% cases and controls according to the quality of the evidence 40% high and 60% moderate.According to the strength of strong recommendation 40% and weak 60%., According to the country of origin of evidence: Italy 40%, Canada 20%, United Kingdom 10%, Korea 10%, Germany 10% and United States 10% respectively. Results:The 10% (n = 1/10) of the articles indicate the effectiveness of the anticoagulation practice in the reduction of thromboembolism during the oxygenation of the venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane (ECMO) in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.30% (n = 3/10) indicate the concordance of the anticoagulation practice but not the effectiveness.60% (n = 6/10) of the articles disagree. Conclusion:We conclude that 10% reported the effectiveness of the anticoagulation practice in the reduction of thromboembolism during the oxygenation of the venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane (ECMO) in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.30% indicate the coincidence of the anticoagulation practice but not the effectiveness.60% disagree, due to the quality of the limited studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".