El beso como detalle narrativo en los relatos “Llegar a Japón” de Alice Munro y “El beso” de Anton P. Chejov
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This analysis proposes a contrastive approach between two short stories, The Kiss by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov and To Reach Japan, written by Alice Munro. The word Chekhovian is remarked to refer to Chekhov’s short-story narrative and, according to such allusions, to establish a textual dialogue with Canadian writer Alice Munro. The analysisis based upon the relevance of the detail in both short-story narratives. The detail is an intensively brief element in the text that refers to daily life and determines the evolution of story characters. It is tied to daily-life events and both writers’ narrations imply the surge of an exceptional daily-life. In these stories by Munro and Chekhov, the detail is represented by a kiss. From the instant of the kiss onwards, its remembrance chronogically structures both texts. It conditions the characters’ identities and perceptions of others’ emotions. The detail of the kiss is to be narrated though it is an indicative of the lack of significant words. The kiss instants are located in places alien to daily residence so intimacies in movement are conformed in the characters of both stories. In consequence, the narrative detail is the criterion to analyze those arguments and to establish links between short-story narratives of Anton Chekhov and Alice Munro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".