Eduard Albert a realisté. Osobnost Eduarda Alberta a jeho role v české politice v 80. a 90. letech 19. století
Bibliographic record
Abstract
My doctoral thesis focuses on Eduard Albert (1841-1900), who was a significant figure in Czech and Austrian scientific, cultural, as well as political circles at the end of the 19th century. I concentrated my research primarily on the relatively unknown aspects of Albert's life, i.e. his private life and political activities. My fundamental question was: what kind of role did a man, whose professional career and social status in Vienna reached brilliant heights, play in Czech political life? Although he initially resisted openly engaging in politics, he found he could not stand completely on the sidelines. Albert's relationship to the Realist group reveals that Albert was vitally interested in contemporary political events. He was no mere passive observer - he often actively interfered in Czech politics. Another topic I focused on was Albert's attitude toward the Czech Academy of Arts and Sciences. Even in this instance, the creation of the Czech Academy wasn't a purely scientific question, but was to a great extent a political decision. The thesis is divided into six main chapters, the composition of which combines chronological and thematic approaches. In the introduction I tried to define the topic and establish a conceptual framework; I summarized the research up to now and analyzed the most...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".