MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7000139318

The emerging role of the Internet in municipal planning

2000· other· en· W7000139318 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetContext (archaeology)Process (computing)Internet researchPublic participationPerceptionInternet access
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research project examines the role of the Internet in the context of municipal planning during a six-month period beginning in April of 1999 and ending in September of 1999. The research objectives include: identifying current applications of the Internet in municipal planning agencies; describing the planning, design, and implementation considerations for the Web development process; investigating planners' perceptions of the Internet; and considering the future possibilities for the Internet in municipal planning practice. The Internet phenomenon is first explored in terms of its socio-cultural implications for public participation in planning, issues of access and security, and the perception of community. Next, the evolution of computers in planning is explored and some of the practical applications of the Internet are presented through the use of current examples. The development of such applications is also explored in terms of planning, design, and implementation considerations with the intent to provide some practical guidelines for planning agencies. Subsequently, the research process is explained with particular focus on an Internet-based survey developed with HTML. The results of this survey are presented and provide insight to the status of Internet usage in Canadian municipal planning agencies. From the results, one can infer that municipal planners feel positively about the use of the Internet in planning practice and that the obstacles to the development of Internet-based applications are trivial compared to the possibilities that exist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→French-language works237,207→