MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000148862

Émilie Rondeau : Morceaux de paysage

2009· book· fr· W7000148862 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueE-Artexte (Artexte) · 2009
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Analysis and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)SuiteNova scotiaIdentity (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

morceaux de paysage inTeRVenTion inFilTRanTe 16 août > 16 novembre 2009 carte du parcours sur www.3e-imperial.orgrandonnée guidée et rencontre publique samedi 03 octobre 2009, 14 h 3 e impérial, 164 rue Cowie, Granby Centre d'essai en art actuel, le 3 e impérial allie à la résidence d'artiste, la production, la diffusion et la mise en contexte de l'art actuel sur un territoire signifiant tout en favorisant l'émergence de nouvelles pratiques d'art public qui infiltrent l'environnement géographique et social.164 rue Cowie, suite 330 Granby Québec J2G 3V3 w w w. 3 e -i m p e ri a l .o rg Comment penser, percevoir, sentir et amuser le réel de façon dynamique?Comment échapper à la stabilité apparente du monde et du présent avec l'objectif de les transformer?Comment révéler l'invisible?Par d'habiles détours, par des renversements de perspective, des manœuvres épiques, la construction d'utopies, ou en dévoilant un entre-lieu?À vous maintenant de réinventer le miroir d'alice… l'enVeRS de l'endRoiT c'est une pensée artistique perpétuellement en mouvement qui, pourtant, ne tourne pas en rond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-Artexte (Artexte)Same topicLiterary Analysis and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207