The Effects of the new tariff on the Upper Canada trade.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
That the new Tariff, now under the consideration of Parliament, is sectional in its tendency and inimical to the interests of Upper Canada, must be obvious to every one possessing the smallest acquaintance with the trade of the country.The determined advocacy with which it meets from the lower section, and the counter anxiety and alarm with which it is viewed by the whole commercial community of the Upper Province, affords, perhaps, the best index to the extent of the injustice that will be inflicted upon Upper Canadian* should the proposed Tariff' become law.The attempt, to force, b v legislation, the trade of any locality out of its legitimate channel, or the purpose of furthering the interests of some other less favored locality, would at any time be regarded as impolitic and unjust; but the attempt to force the whole trade of Upper Canada into Mont- real, for the exclusive benefit of a few importing merchants of that city , by a manifestly unfair imposition of customs duties, as now pro- posed, is an act of injustice that must meet with the censure and condemnation of every intelligent man.That this will be the effect, if it be not the avowed object of Mr.Gait's Tariff, no one, who is uninfluenced by Montreal interests, will be disposed to deny.And that such a result would prove in the last degree disastrous to Upper Canada is equally indisputable.Let us look at the facts of t\\e gas&t / r J jJ tS hJ U X o*r
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".