Enhancing Information Systems Security through Biometrics (Mise en valeur de la securite des systemes d'information par la biometrie) (CD-ROM)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ELECTRONIC FILE CHARACTERISTICS: 64 files; Adobe Acrobat (.PDF), MS PowerPoint (.PPS) and HTML. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 1 CD-ROM; 4 3/4 in.; 85.3 MB. ABSTRACT: The Information Systems Technology (IST) Panel of the NATO Research and Technology Organisation (RTO) sponsored a workshop on Enhancing Information Systems Security through Biometrics. This workshop was hosted by Defence Research and Development Canada and was held in Ottawa (October 2004). This report includes the workshop presentations, summaries of discussions from the breakdowns sessions, main findings, and recommendations to the IST Panel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it